← arena

provider specs

what you need to know before integrating — verified against each vendor’s own docs on 2026-08-26; every provider name links to the page it was checked against

providerpricing modelest. cost/querylatencyapi patterncitationsspecial capabilities
OpenAI o3 ↗
o3-deep-research
per-token$10 / $40 per 1M tok (~$1-10/query)10-30+ minResponses API, async background (poll / webhook)yes (inline annotations: url, title, start/end index)
MCP serverscode interpreterweb search$10 / 1k web-search calls
OpenAI GPT-5.5 Pro ↗
gpt-5.5-pro
per-token$30 / $180 per 1M tok (no cached rate)several min (vendor)Responses API, async background recommendedyes (inline annotations via web search tool)
web searchMCP serversfile searchcode interpreter+10% regional processing
OpenAI o4-mini ↗
o4-mini-deep-research
deprecated · off the arena roster since 2026-07-23 — jobs fail model_not_found; OpenAI still lists it, no notice
per-token$2 / $8 per 1M tok3-10 minResponses API, async backgroundyes (inline annotations)
MCP serverscode interpreterfile searchweb search
Perplexity Sonar ↗
sonar-deep-research
deprecated · Sonar endpoints retire 2026-09-27 → Agent API preset “high”
per-token + per-search$2 / $8 per 1M tok + $5 / 1k searches (~$0.30-1.30/query)1-3 minPOST /v1/sonar (sync) or /v1/async/sonar (poll)yes (citations[] URLs + search_results[] w/ snippets)
citation-focusedsearch groundingbilled per token + citation + reasoning + search
Gemini Deep Research ↗
deep-research-preview-04-2026
per-token + per-search~$1-3/task (vendor est.)minutes (60 min max)Interactions API, async (background=true; poll / stream / webhook)yes (cited report; schema not documented)
google searchurl contextcode executionMCPfile searchvisualizationmultimodal
Gemini Deep Research Max ↗
deep-research-max-preview-04-2026
per-token + per-search~$3-7/task (vendor est.)up to 60 minInteractions API, async (background=true; poll / stream / webhook)yes (cited report; schema not documented)
~160 searches/taskgoogle searchurl contextcode executionMCPfile searchvisualization
Parallel Pro ↗
pro
per-request$0.10/run2-10 minTask API, async (poll / webhook / SSE)yes (citations + excerpts + confidence, per element)
structured JSON outputauto-schema1 of 9 tiers (lite→ultra8x)failed runs not billed
Parallel Pro-Fast ↗
pro-fast
per-request$0.10/run30s-5 minTask API, async (poll / webhook / SSE)yes (citations + excerpts + confidence, per element)
structured JSON outputauto-schemafaster variant (speed over freshness)
Parallel Ultra ↗
ultra
per-request$0.30/run5-25 minTask API, async (poll / webhook / SSE)yes (citations + excerpts + confidence, per element)
structured JSON outputauto-schemadeep research modeultra2x/4x/8x at $0.60/$1.20/$2.40
Parallel Ultra-Fast ↗
ultra-fast
per-request$0.30/run1-10 minTask API, async (poll / webhook / SSE)yes (citations + excerpts + confidence, per element)
structured JSON outputauto-schemafaster variant (speed over freshness)
Valyu DeepResearch ↗
deepresearch (fast/standard/heavy/max)
per-request$0.10 / $0.50 / $2.50 / $15 per task5 min - 3 hr (vendor pages disagree)REST, async (poll / HMAC webhook)yes (sources[]: title + url)
SEC/academic/clinical/patent sourcesstructured JSON outputpython sandbox $0.10/runscreenshots $0.05/URL
You.com Research ↗
research (lite→frontier)
per-request$0.012 / $0.05 / $0.10 / $0.45 / $1.20 per call< 10s - 5 min (frontier p50 5 min)REST, sync (background=true → poll / SSE; frontier background-only)yes (inline [[n]] + sources[] w/ snippets)
structured JSON output (not lite)source control (domains/freshness)finance research variant
Exa Agent ↗
agent (effort minimal→xhigh, auto/max)
deprecated · legacy /research API (exa-research, exa-research-pro) retired by Exa — HTTP 410 RESEARCH_RETIRED; arena now runs Agent tiers
per-request$0.012 - $1.00/run (auto/max metered, $0.10/ACU)2-15 min (measured); vendor: not statedAgent API POST /agent/runs, async (poll 4s / SSE)yes (output.grounding: field-level citations + confidence)
Exa's own indexstructured output w/ groundingreturns real per-run costDollarsdeep search $12-15/1k

benchmarks

two kinds of evidence per provider. measured by research.site — our own pre-registered studies: frozen tasks, one harness, published configs and costs (all studies). published elsewhere — academic leaderboards and vendor evals we don’t run, catalogued with methods and authorship on external benchmarks; vendor-run figures were published by a vendor in the comparison, independent ones by the benchmark’s authors or a third party. some studies test the vendor’s deep research API, others its search tool behind an agent — each row says which. for a blind community signal see the arena leaderboard.

at a glance · best configuration per study

providerDSE-246Astra-26LBC-30RB-30DRB2-20external
OpenAI
direct compare only
not run42.3%
#1 of 5
46.7%
#2 of 8
not runnot run21 scores
Perplexity
in blind pool
not runnot runnot run73.4%
#1 of 6
34.1%
#6 of 9
31 scores
Gemini
in blind pool
not runnot runnot runnot runnot run14 scores
Parallel
in blind pool
not run26.9%
#4 of 5
not run72.2%
#2 of 6
29.1%
#8 of 9
18 scores
Exa
in blind pool
60.4%
#1 of 2
42.3%
#1 of 5
60.0%
#1 of 8 · best of 2
66.6%
#4 of 6
45.0%
#1 of 9 · best of 5
21 scores
Valyu
in blind pool
not run23.1%
#5 of 5
26.7%
#7 of 8 · best of 2
70.2%
#3 of 6
31.4%
#7 of 9
4 scores
You.com
in blind pool
not runnot runnot run58.5%
#5 of 6
not run8 scores
Keenable
not yet measured as deep research
not run38.5%
#3 of 5
46.7%
#2 of 8 · best of 2
not runnot run3 scores

each study ranks only the arms it ran — ranks are not comparable across columns. metrics: DSE-246 accuracy · Astra-26 accuracy · LBC-30 accuracy · RB-30 rubric coverage · DRB2-20 rubric pass rate.

OpenAIdirect compare only · 2 research.site results · 21 external scores
measured by research.site
studytested asresultrankdetail
Astra-26GPT-6 Astra + Codex built-in web search
search tool (agent backend)
11/26 (42.3%)
accuracy
#1 of 5Wilson 95% 26%–61% · median 257 s · $3.84 / task · $9.08 / correct
LBC-30Codex CLI · live web_search
search tool (agent backend)
46.7%
accuracy
#2 of 8dated 40.0% · undated 53.3% · cost ~$1–6* · 2.4M tokens
published elsewhere
benchmarkas publishedscorereported bysource
DeepResearch Benchopenai-deepresearch
2025 ChatGPT deep research; model version not named
47.84
RACE 0–100, relative to a reference report
benchmark authorshuggingface.co ↗
DeepResearch BenchGPT-5
same Parallel run; not labeled as o3-deep-research
66% win rate
RACE 0–100, relative to a reference report
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
DeepResearch Bench IIGPT-o3 Deep Research
GPT-5.5 judge; 45.40 on the Gemini-2.5-Pro board
43.12
rubric pass rate 0–100
benchmark authorshuggingface.co ↗
DRACO
vendor-authored benchmark
OpenAI Deep Research (o3)52.1%
normalized rubric score %
Perplexity (paper)
vendor-run
arxiv.org ↗
ResearchRubricsOpenAI DR
binary 0.597
0.664
rubric compliance 0–1 (ternary)
benchmark authorsarxiv.org ↗
LiveResearchBenchOpenAI o3 Deep Research
citation association only 30.9
62.9
average of 4 dimensions, 0–100
benchmark authorslivedeepresearch.github.io ↗
LiveResearchBenchOpenAI o4-mini Deep Research
model shut down by OpenAI 2026-07
61.8
average of 4 dimensions, 0–100
benchmark authorslivedeepresearch.github.io ↗
ResearcherBenchOpenAI Deep Research
faithfulness 0.84 · groundedness 0.34; top coverage
0.7032
rubric coverage 0–1
benchmark authorsgithub.com ↗
DeepResearchGymgpt4-search-preview
search model, not OpenAI deep research
40.01 KPR
key-point recall (KPR) 0–100
benchmark authorsarxiv.org ↗
ReportBenchOpenAI Deep Research
reference precision 0.385; non-cited factual accuracy 95.83%
78.87% match
citation match rate % · factual accuracy %
benchmark authorsarxiv.org ↗
BrowseComp
vendor-authored benchmark
Deep Research
paper notes Deep Research was trained on BrowseComp-like data
51.5%
accuracy %
OpenAI (paper)
vendor-run
arxiv.org ↗
DeepSearchQA
vendor-authored benchmark
o3 Deep Research
±3.3; F1 66.5; run by a competing vendor
44.2%
fully-correct accuracy % (some vendors report F1)
Google (Kaggle board)
vendor-run
kaggle.com ↗
DeepSearchQA
vendor-authored benchmark
o4 mini Deep Research
±3.2; model since shut down
40.4%
fully-correct accuracy % (some vendors report F1)
Google (Kaggle board)
vendor-run
kaggle.com ↗
WideSearchOpenAI o3 (E2E System)
success rate 3.0%
23.9% row F1
row-level F1 % (paper: table success rate)
benchmark authorswidesearch-seed.github.io ↗
xbench-DeepSearchChatGPT-5-Pro
top row; ChatGPT product, not the o3-deep-research API; evaluated 2025-08-28
79
accuracy %, integer
xbenchxbench.org ↗
BrowseComp-ZHOpenAI DeepResearch
best product row; calibration error 9
42.9%
accuracy %
benchmark authorsgithub.com ↗
search_evals (Perplexity)
vendor-authored benchmark
openai (Responses API, GPT 5.5 high)
web_search tool — not o3-deep-research; HLE 0.614
BC 0.720 · DSQA 0.733
accuracy 0–1 (WideSearch: row F1)
Perplexity
vendor-run
github.com ↗
WANDR
vendor-authored benchmark
OpenAI0.130
soft F1 0–1
Perplexity
vendor-run
perplexity.ai ↗
Mind2Web 2OpenAI Deep Research
partial 0.54 · pass@3 0.40
0.28
success rate 0–1
benchmark authorsosu-nlp-group.github.io ↗
Artificial Analysis Search IndexOpenAI Web Search (medium)
web search tool, not o3-deep-research
74
index 0–100
Artificial Analysisartificialanalysis.ai ↗
NEEDLE
vendor-authored benchmark
chatgpt-search
p50 40 s
48%
7-day mean % of oracle
Keenable
vendor-run
keenableai.github.io ↗
Perplexityin blind pool · 2 research.site results · 31 external scores
measured by research.site
studytested asresultrankdetail
RB-30sonar-deep-research
deep research API
73.4%
rubric coverage
#1 of 695% CI 65%–80% · faithfulness 22.1% · groundedness 31.6% · 9,148 claims checked · token-metered · judges o3-mini / gpt-4.1
DRB2-20sonar-deep-research
deep research API
34.1%
rubric pass rate
#6 of 9info recall 26.1 · analysis 48.4 · presentation 81.3 · 5.6 min mean · token-metered · judge gemini-3.1-pro-preview
published elsewhere
benchmarkas publishedscorereported bysource
DeepResearch Benchperplexity-Research
Perplexity app Research mode, 2025 outputs
43.05
RACE 0–100, relative to a reference report
benchmark authorshuggingface.co ↗
DeepResearch BenchPerplexity
same Parallel run; tier not specified
6% win rate
RACE 0–100, relative to a reference report
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
DeepResearch Bench IIPerplexity Research
38.58 on the Gemini-2.5-Pro board
33.57
rubric pass rate 0–100
benchmark authorshuggingface.co ↗
DRACO
vendor-authored benchmark
Perplexity Deep Research (Opus 4.6)
pass rate 72.8%; drops to 50.4 under the GPT-5.2 judge
70.5%
normalized rubric score %
Perplexity (paper)
vendor-run
arxiv.org ↗
ResearchRubricsPerplexity DR
binary 0.487
0.566
rubric compliance 0–1 (ternary)
benchmark authorsarxiv.org ↗
LiveResearchBenchPerplexity Sonar Deep Research
#2 of single-agent deep research
67.1
average of 4 dimensions, 0–100
benchmark authorslivedeepresearch.github.io ↗
ResearcherBenchPerplexity Deep Research
faithfulness 0.85 · groundedness 0.56
0.4800
rubric coverage 0–1
benchmark authorsgithub.com ↗
DeepResearchGymperplexity-sonar-deepsearch
citation recall 99.22, precision 55.65; top KPR
72.50 KPR
key-point recall (KPR) 0–100
benchmark authorsarxiv.org ↗
BrowseComp
vendor-authored benchmark
Agent API `high`
stated successor to Sonar Deep Research; xhigh 85.33%; undated, no task count
78.00%
accuracy %
Perplexity
vendor-run
docs.perplexity.ai ↗
BrowseComp
vendor-authored benchmark
Sonar Deep Research
same page; Sonar retires 2026-09-27
29.10%
accuracy %
Perplexity
vendor-run
docs.perplexity.ai ↗
BrowseComp
vendor-authored benchmark
Perplexity high
Parallel's run of a competitor
86%
accuracy %
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
DeepSearchQA
vendor-authored benchmark
Agent API `xhigh` / `high`
F1, not accuracy; Sonar Deep Research 48.94% F1
93.00% / 89.60% F1
fully-correct accuracy % (some vendors report F1)
Perplexity
vendor-run
docs.perplexity.ai ↗
DeepSearchQA
vendor-authored benchmark
Perplexity high
Parallel's run — vs 89.60% F1 in Perplexity's own docs (different metric and sample)
68%
fully-correct accuracy % (some vendors report F1)
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
WideSearchPerplexity (frontier)
same Parallel harness; low-cost tier 47
53.5%
row-level F1 % (paper: table success rate)
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
BrowseComp-ZHPerplexity (Research)
calibration error 53
22.6%
accuracy %
benchmark authorsgithub.com ↗
Humanity's Last ExamDeep Research on Perplexity
2025-02-14
21.1%
accuracy %
Perplexity
vendor-run
perplexity.ai ↗
search_evals (Perplexity)
vendor-authored benchmark
perplexity (Agent API, GPT 5.5 high)
HLE 0.612 · WideSearch 0.651
BC 0.805 · DSQA 0.871
accuracy 0–1 (WideSearch: row F1)
Perplexity
vendor-run
github.com ↗
WANDR
vendor-authored benchmark
Perplexity Search as Code
hard F1 0.133; the Search-as-Code post says 0.386
0.363 soft F1
soft F1 0–1
Perplexity
vendor-run
perplexity.ai ↗
Mind2Web 2Perplexity Deep Research
partial 0.42
0.15
success rate 0–1
benchmark authorsosu-nlp-group.github.io ↗
Artificial Analysis Search IndexPerplexity Search (medium)
BrowseComp 87, highest on the board · 27.0 s/task
80
index 0–100
Artificial Analysisartificialanalysis.ai ↗
NEEDLE
vendor-authored benchmark
perplexity
p50 345 ms
67%
7-day mean % of oracle
Keenable
vendor-run
keenableai.github.io ↗
Multi-turn company search (openbenchmarks)Perplexity (search_context_size=low)
14.1 s
37.8%
F1 %
openbenchmarksopenbenchmarks.com ↗
AIMultiple Agentic SearchPerplexity
#7; 11.77–14.22
12.96
agent score /20 (relevance × quality)
AIMultipleaimultiple.com ↗
SimpleQA
vendor-authored benchmark
Perplexity Search API
2025-09-25; Exa .781 in the same run
93.0%
% correct
Perplexity
vendor-run
perplexity.ai ↗
SimpleQA
vendor-authored benchmark
Deep Research on Perplexity
2025-02-14
93.9%
% correct
Perplexity
vendor-run
perplexity.ai ↗
SimpleQA
vendor-authored benchmark
Perplexity Search
Tavily's run, undated; Exa 71.24%, Tavily 93.3%
85.92%
% correct
Tavily
vendor-run
github.com ↗
SimpleQA Verified
vendor-authored benchmark
Perplexity (frontier)
Parallel's run
95%
% correct
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
FRAMES
vendor-authored benchmark
Perplexity Search API
2025-09-25, single-step; Exa 39.9% in the same run
45.3%
accuracy %
Perplexity
vendor-run
perplexity.ai ↗
You.com web-search-api-evals
vendor-authored benchmark
perplexity_sonar_deep_research_high53.78%
accuracy %
You.com
vendor-run
github.com ↗
WISER-Search
vendor-authored benchmark
Perplexity Deep Research
Parallel Core 77 on the same set
64% (Atomic)
accuracy %
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
Search ArenaSonar-Reasoning-Pro-High
statistically tied for #1; April 2025
1136
Arena score (Bradley-Terry) with CI
Perplexity
vendor-run
perplexity.ai ↗
Geminiin blind pool · 0 research.site results · 14 external scores
measured by research.site
not in any research.site study yet
published elsewhere
benchmarkas publishedscorereported bysource
DeepResearch Benchgemini-2.5-pro-deepresearch
2025 outputs re-judged by GPT-5.5
49.98
RACE 0–100, relative to a reference report
benchmark authorshuggingface.co ↗
DeepResearch Bench IIGemini 3 Pro Deep Research
Gemini 2.5 Pro Deep Research 39.89 on the same board
41.52
rubric pass rate 0–100
benchmark authorshuggingface.co ↗
DRACO
vendor-authored benchmark
Gemini Deep Research
version not specified (pre-Max)
59.0%
normalized rubric score %
Perplexity (paper)
vendor-run
arxiv.org ↗
ResearchRubricsGemini DR
binary 0.615; top system; 2025 version
0.677
rubric compliance 0–1 (ternary)
benchmark authorsarxiv.org ↗
LiveResearchBenchGemini Deep Research66.4
average of 4 dimensions, 0–100
benchmark authorslivedeepresearch.github.io ↗
ResearcherBenchGemini Deep Research
faithfulness 0.86 · groundedness 0.59
0.6929
rubric coverage 0–1
benchmark authorsgithub.com ↗
ReportBenchGemini Deep Research
reference precision 0.145; non-cited factual accuracy 92.21%
72.94% match
citation match rate % · factual accuracy %
benchmark authorsarxiv.org ↗
BrowseComp
vendor-authored benchmark
Gemini Deep Research
Dec 2025 agent (deep-research-pro-preview-12-2025)
59.2%
accuracy %
Google
vendor-run
blog.google ↗
DeepSearchQA
vendor-authored benchmark
Gemini Deep Research Agent
±3.2; F1 81.9; evaluated 2025-12-11, row since relabeled deep-research-preview-04-2026 without a re-run
66.1%
fully-correct accuracy % (some vendors report F1)
Google (Kaggle board)
vendor-run
kaggle.com ↗
WideSearchGemini 2.5 Pro (E2E System)
success rate 4.3%; consumer web-browsing mode, not Deep Research
36.6% row F1
row-level F1 % (paper: table success rate)
benchmark authorswidesearch-seed.github.io ↗
xbench-DeepSearchGemini Pro
consumer app; board doesn't say whether Deep Research mode was used
53
accuracy %, integer
xbenchxbench.org ↗
Humanity's Last ExamGemini Deep Research
full HLE set, Dec 2025 agent
46.4%
accuracy %
Google
vendor-run
blog.google ↗
Mind2Web 2Gemini Deep Research
partial 0.45
0.18
success rate 0–1
benchmark authorsosu-nlp-group.github.io ↗
Search ArenaGemini-2.5-Pro-Grounding
Gemini grounding, not Deep Research; April 2025 snapshot
1142
Arena score (Bradley-Terry) with CI
Perplexity
vendor-run
perplexity.ai ↗
Parallelin blind pool · 3 research.site results · 18 external scores
measured by research.site
studytested asresultrankdetail
Astra-26GPT-6 Astra + MCP search / fetch
search tool (agent backend)
7/26 (26.9%)
accuracy
#4 of 5Wilson 95% 14%–46% · median 215 s · $1.37 / task · $5.08 / correct
RB-30ultra
deep research API
72.2%
rubric coverage
#2 of 695% CI 67%–78% · faithfulness 95.4% · groundedness 48.0% · 5,856 claims checked · $0.30 / request · judges o3-mini / gpt-4.1
DRB2-20ultra
deep research API
29.1%
rubric pass rate
#8 of 9info recall 22.9 · analysis 31.1 · presentation 84.3 · 10.0 min mean · $0.30 / request · judge gemini-3.1-pro-preview
published elsewhere
benchmarkas publishedscorereported bysource
DeepResearch BenchParallel Ultra / Ultra8x
different metric: share of 50 English tasks beating the reference report; runs dated “Aug 11–29”, no year
82% / 96% win rate
RACE 0–100, relative to a reference report
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
DRACO
vendor-authored benchmark
Parallel Ultra8x
$2,400 per 1k
51.2%
normalized rubric score %
Valyu
vendor-run
github.com ↗
BrowseComp
vendor-authored benchmark
Parallel Ultra4x (Task API)
100-question subset, 2026-08-26; Lite 88 · Core 91 · Ultra 92
94%
accuracy %
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
DeepSearchQA
vendor-authored benchmark
Parallel Ultra4x (Task API)
100-question subset
86%
fully-correct accuracy % (some vendors report F1)
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
WideSearchParallel Search Advanced
search API behind a GPT-5.6 Sol agent; 100 English tasks
57.6%
row-level F1 % (paper: table success rate)
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
search_evals (Perplexity)
vendor-authored benchmark
parallel (Task API ultra4x)
Parallel reports 94% BrowseComp for the same processor
BC 0.56 · DSQA 0.81
accuracy 0–1 (WideSearch: row F1)
Perplexity
vendor-run
github.com ↗
WANDR
vendor-authored benchmark
Parallel0.126
soft F1 0–1
Perplexity
vendor-run
perplexity.ai ↗
Artificial Analysis Search IndexParallel Search (advanced)
basic 73
75
index 0–100
Artificial Analysisartificialanalysis.ai ↗
NEEDLE
vendor-authored benchmark
parallel
p50 3.4 s
62%
7-day mean % of oracle
Keenable
vendor-run
keenableai.github.io ↗
Multi-turn company search (openbenchmarks)Parallel basic (/v1/search)
top row; $5 per 1k queries
46.5%
F1 %
openbenchmarksopenbenchmarks.com ↗
AIMultiple Agentic SearchParallel Search (Pro)
#4; 13.07–15.47
14.21
agent score /20 (relevance × quality)
AIMultipleaimultiple.com ↗
SimpleQA
vendor-authored benchmark
parallel_search_basic
You.com's run
94.87%
% correct
You.com
vendor-run
github.com ↗
SimpleQA Verified
vendor-authored benchmark
Parallel Search Advanced / Basic
frontier agent (GPT-5.6 Sol high), 100 questions, 2026-09-09
97%
% correct
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
FRAMES
vendor-authored benchmark
parallel_search_basic73.79%
accuracy %
You.com
vendor-run
github.com ↗
FreshQAParallel
Valyu's run; tier not stated
52%
accuracy %
Valyu
vendor-run
valyu.ai ↗
Valyu domain search evals
vendor-authored benchmark
Parallel67% / 52% / 42%
accuracy %
Valyu
vendor-run
valyu.ai ↗
You.com web-search-api-evals
vendor-authored benchmark
parallel_ultra
pro 34.45%
73.11%
accuracy %
You.com
vendor-run
github.com ↗
WISER-Search
vendor-authored benchmark
GPT 4.1 w/ Parallel Search MCP
2025-07
74.9
accuracy %
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
Exain blind pool · 10 research.site results · 21 external scores
measured by research.site
studytested asresultrankdetail
DSE-246GPT-6 Astra + Exa Search + Contents
search tool (agent backend)
297/492 (60.4%)
accuracy
#1 of 2vs DeepSeek Search + Fetch 47.6% · median 87 s · model $462.01 + tools $75.96 total
Astra-26GPT-6 Astra + MCP search / fetch
search tool (agent backend)
11/26 (42.3%)
accuracy
#1 of 5Wilson 95% 26%–61% · median 158 s · $1.26 / task · $2.98 / correct
LBC-30Claude Code · Exa MCP
search tool (agent backend)
60.0%
accuracy
#1 of 8dated 66.7% · undated 53.3% · cost $50.31 · cheapest Claude arm
LBC-30Codex CLI · Exa MCP
search tool (agent backend)
40.0%
accuracy
#6 of 8dated 46.7% · undated 33.3% · cost ~$1–5* · 425 MCP calls
RB-30high
deep research API
66.6%
rubric coverage
#4 of 695% CI 60%–73% · faithfulness 89.1% · groundedness 36.3% · 2,468 claims checked · $0.50 / request · judges o3-mini / gpt-4.1
DRB2-20agent · medium
deep research API
45.0%
rubric pass rate
#1 of 9info recall 39.3 · analysis 50.2 · presentation 90.5 · 4.2 min mean · $0.10 / request · judge gemini-3.1-pro-preview
DRB2-20agent · high
deep research API
43.8%
rubric pass rate
#2 of 9info recall 39.2 · analysis 41.9 · presentation 91.8 · 4.5 min mean · $0.50 / request · judge gemini-3.1-pro-preview
DRB2-20agent · low
deep research API
43.8%
rubric pass rate
#3 of 9info recall 38.9 · analysis 44.1 · presentation 87.0 · 3.9 min mean · $0.025 / request · judge gemini-3.1-pro-preview
DRB2-20agent · minimal
deep research API
40.9%
rubric pass rate
#4 of 9info recall 34.8 · analysis 46.9 · presentation 86.8 · 2.2 min mean · $0.012 / request · judge gemini-3.1-pro-preview
DRB2-20agent · xhigh
deep research API
39.5%
rubric pass rate
#5 of 9info recall 35.3 · analysis 31.6 · presentation 93.4 · 5.0 min mean · $1.00 / request · judge gemini-3.1-pro-preview
published elsewhere
benchmarkas publishedscorereported bysource
DRACO
vendor-authored benchmark
Exa Deep Reasoning
Exa search type=deep-reasoning — not the Agent API; $15 per 1k
25.9%
normalized rubric score %
Valyu
vendor-run
github.com ↗
BrowseComp
vendor-authored benchmark
Exa Agent Max
Parallel's run; “max” is not a public Exa effort tier
78%
accuracy %
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
BrowseComp
vendor-authored benchmark
Exa 3.0
2026-10-19; read from the chart's alt text; no harness, sample or grader stated
91.8%
accuracy %
Exa
vendor-run
exa.ai ↗
DeepSearchQA
vendor-authored benchmark
Exa Agent Max
Parallel's run
65%
fully-correct accuracy % (some vendors report F1)
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
DeepSearchQA
vendor-authored benchmark
Exa 3.0
chart alt text; no harness stated
88.2%
fully-correct accuracy % (some vendors report F1)
Exa
vendor-run
exa.ai ↗
WideSearchExa Auto (frontier)
same Parallel harness; low-cost tier 53
55.9%
row-level F1 % (paper: table success rate)
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
WideSearchExa 3.0
chart alt text
56.1%
row-level F1 % (paper: table success rate)
Exa
vendor-run
exa.ai ↗
search_evals (Perplexity)
vendor-authored benchmark
exa (Agent API, effort high)
HLE 0.387 · WideSearch 0.471
BC 0.38 · DSQA 0.53
accuracy 0–1 (WideSearch: row F1)
Perplexity
vendor-run
github.com ↗
WANDR
vendor-authored benchmark
Exa0.057
soft F1 0–1
Perplexity
vendor-run
perplexity.ai ↗
Artificial Analysis Search IndexExa Search (auto, dynamic highlights)
DSQA 86 · BrowseComp 83 · $53.17 search per 1k tasks
80
index 0–100
Artificial Analysisartificialanalysis.ai ↗
Vals Web Search IndexClaude Fable 5 | Exa
#2; GPT-5.6 Sol | Exa 45.24%
48.45%
% correct overall
Vals AIvals.ai ↗
NEEDLE
vendor-authored benchmark
exa
p50 3.0 s; exa-instant 60%
68%
7-day mean % of oracle
Keenable
vendor-run
keenableai.github.io ↗
Multi-turn company search (openbenchmarks)Exa deep (/search type=deep)
44.7 s mean search time
45.4%
F1 %
openbenchmarksopenbenchmarks.com ↗
AIMultiple Agentic SearchExa
#3; 95% CI 13.25–15.50
14.39
agent score /20 (relevance × quality)
AIMultipleaimultiple.com ↗
SimpleQA
vendor-authored benchmark
exa_search_with_text
You.com's run; p50 2.5 s
95.40%
% correct
You.com
vendor-run
github.com ↗
SimpleQA Verified
vendor-authored benchmark
Exa Auto (frontier)
Parallel's run
91%
% correct
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
FRAMES
vendor-authored benchmark
exa_search_with_text73.79%
accuracy %
You.com
vendor-run
github.com ↗
FreshQAExa
Valyu's run; mode not stated
24%
accuracy %
Valyu
vendor-run
valyu.ai ↗
Valyu domain search evals
vendor-authored benchmark
Exa63% / 45% / 44%
accuracy %
Valyu
vendor-run
valyu.ai ↗
You.com web-search-api-evals
vendor-authored benchmark
exa_research_pro
retired endpoint (HTTP 410)
42.02%
accuracy %
You.com
vendor-run
github.com ↗
WISER-Search
vendor-authored benchmark
GPT 4.1 w/ Exa Search MCP
Parallel's run
58.67
accuracy %
Parallel
vendor-run
parallel.ai ↗
Valyuin blind pool · 5 research.site results · 4 external scores
measured by research.site
studytested asresultrankdetail
Astra-26GPT-6 Astra + MCP search / fetch
search tool (agent backend)
6/26 (23.1%)
accuracy
#5 of 5Wilson 95% 11%–42% · median 299 s · $1.56 / task · $6.74 / correct
LBC-30Claude Code · Valyu MCP
search tool (agent backend)
26.7%
accuracy
#7 of 8dated 26.7% · undated 26.7% · cost $117.93
LBC-30Codex CLI · Valyu MCP
search tool (agent backend)
20.0%
accuracy
#8 of 8dated 33.3% · undated 6.7% · cost ~$1.5–7* · 858 MCP calls, 2.7M tokens
RB-30standard
deep research API
70.2%
rubric coverage
#3 of 695% CI 65%–76% · faithfulness 75.9% · groundedness 49.5% · 9,654 claims checked · $0.50 / request · judges o3-mini / gpt-4.1
DRB2-20standard
deep research API
31.4%
rubric pass rate
#7 of 9info recall 25.1 · analysis 37.2 · presentation 78.2 · 15.1 min mean · $0.50 / request · judge gemini-3.1-pro-preview
published elsewhere
benchmarkas publishedscorereported bysource
DRACO
vendor-authored benchmark
Valyu DeepResearch (Heavy)
$2,500 per 1k queries; single run; Max tier not run
72.7%
normalized rubric score %
Valyu
vendor-run
github.com ↗
SimpleQA
vendor-authored benchmark
Valyu
Parallel 93% · Exa 91% · Google 38% in the same run (2025-10-03)
94%
% correct
Valyu
vendor-run
valyu.ai ↗
FreshQAValyu
2025-10-03; version not stated
79%
accuracy %
Valyu
vendor-run
valyu.ai ↗
Valyu domain search evals
vendor-authored benchmark
Valyu
finance / economic / MedAgent
73% / 73% / 48%
accuracy %
Valyu
vendor-run
valyu.ai ↗
You.comin blind pool · 1 research.site result · 8 external scores
measured by research.site
studytested asresultrankdetail
RB-30exhaustive
deep research API
58.5%
rubric coverage
#5 of 695% CI 53%–65% · faithfulness 15.4% · groundedness 32.5% · 1,112 claims checked · $0.45 / request · judges o3-mini / gpt-4.1
published elsewhere
benchmarkas publishedscorereported bysource
DRACO
vendor-authored benchmark
You.com Research (exhaustive)
$450 per 1k; frontier tier was sales-gated
53.0%
normalized rubric score %
Valyu
vendor-run
github.com ↗
DeepSearchQA
vendor-authored benchmark
Research API Frontier
F1 94.35%; Frontier is $1,200 per 1k, not wired in the arena
86.61%
fully-correct accuracy % (some vendors report F1)
You.com
vendor-run
about.you.com ↗
Artificial Analysis Search IndexYou.com Search (highlights)
19.0 s/task
74
index 0–100
Artificial Analysisartificialanalysis.ai ↗
NEEDLE
vendor-authored benchmark
you
p50 513 ms
58%
7-day mean % of oracle
Keenable
vendor-run
keenableai.github.io ↗
Multi-turn company search (openbenchmarks)You (highlights)
7.7 s
38.6%
F1 %
openbenchmarksopenbenchmarks.com ↗
SimpleQA
vendor-authored benchmark
you_search
README 2026-10-07; p50 598 ms
96.11%
% correct
You.com
vendor-run
github.com ↗
FRAMES
vendor-authored benchmark
you_search74.03%
accuracy %
You.com
vendor-run
github.com ↗
You.com web-search-api-evals
vendor-authored benchmark
you_finance_research_deep
FinSearchComp T2
87.29%
accuracy %
You.com
vendor-run
github.com ↗
Keenablenot yet measured as deep research · 3 research.site results · 3 external scores
measured by research.site
studytested asresultrankdetail
Astra-26GPT-6 Astra + MCP search / fetch
search tool (agent backend)
10/26 (38.5%)
accuracy
#3 of 5Wilson 95% 22%–57% · median 171 s · $1.30 / task · $3.39 / correct
LBC-30Codex CLI · Keenable SELECT (WebQL) MCP (via OpenRouter)
search tool (agent backend)
46.7%
accuracy
#2 of 8dated 33.3% · undated 60.0% · cost ~$15* · 281 select calls; via OpenRouter
LBC-30Claude Code · Keenable SELECT (WebQL) MCP (via OpenRouter)
search tool (agent backend)
43.3%
accuracy
#5 of 8dated 46.7% · undated 40.0% · cost $44.39 · 3 failed runs (idx 49, 156, 307: 3×30-min timeouts each); 1,498 select calls; via OpenRouter
published elsewhere
benchmarkas publishedscorereported bysource
Artificial Analysis Search IndexKeenable Search (pro / realtime)
2026-08-18 launch snapshot — not among the rows on the live board
67
index 0–100
Artificial Analysisartificialanalysis.ai ↗
Vals Web Search IndexGPT-5.6 Sol | Keenable
#1; same model with native search 43.58%
49.08%
% correct overall
Vals AIvals.ai ↗
NEEDLE
vendor-authored benchmark
Keenable
p50 139 ms
73%
7-day mean % of oracle
Keenable
vendor-run
keenableai.github.io ↗
Deep Research API Providers — Features, Pricing & Comparison Table · Deep Research Arena